From xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Mon Dec 16 10:55:04 2013 Received: (at maildrop) by bugs.xenproject.org; 16 Dec 2013 10:55:04 +0000 Received: from lists.xen.org ([50.57.142.19]) by bugs.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VsVpH-0007Im-Vq for xen-devel-maildrop-Eithu9ie@bugs.xenproject.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:55:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VsVlL-0004On-Gx; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:50:59 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VsVlK-0004Nu-0H for xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:50:58 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68:3121] by server-7.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 8B/37-27599-11BDEA25; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:50:57 +0000 X-Env-Sender: George.Dunlap@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1387191055!525885!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.63] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni42MyA9PiAzMDYwNDg=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 7186 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2013 10:50:56 -0000 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com (HELO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.63) by server-12.tower-31.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 16 Dec 2013 10:50:56 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,494,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="82576678" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 16 Dec 2013 10:50:54 +0000 Received: from ukmail1.uk.xensource.com (10.80.16.128) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 05:50:54 -0500 Received: from elijah.uk.xensource.com ([10.80.2.24]) by ukmail1.uk.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VsVlG-0000Ib-3f; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:50:54 +0000 Message-ID: <52AEDB0E.30707@eu.citrix.com> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:50:54 +0000 From: George Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk References: <20131213194326.GA28712@phenom.dumpdata.com> In-Reply-To: <20131213194326.GA28712@phenom.dumpdata.com> X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.4 development update: Is PVH a blocker? X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xen.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org On 12/13/2013 07:43 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> == Open == >> > Also, xl as opposed to xend, allows me to share a disk without > any fanfare. > > Meaning I can do this: > > xl block-attach phy:/dev/sda latest1 xvda w > xl block-attach phy:/dev/sda latest2 xvda w > > while if I had used 'xend' I had to also append the '!' parameter > to denote it as 'shared'. Is xl intended to have that level of information? The 'l' originally meant "light". -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel