From xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Thu Dec 19 14:10:45 2013 Received: (at maildrop) by bugs.xenproject.org; 19 Dec 2013 14:10:45 +0000 Received: from lists.xen.org ([50.57.142.19]) by bugs.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VteJJ-0003WP-2g for xen-devel-maildrop-Eithu9ie@bugs.xenproject.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:10:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VteEs-0004i5-74; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:06:10 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VteEq-0004i0-HX for xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:06:08 +0000 Received: from [85.158.139.211:24030] by server-10.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 8F/2E-01405-F4DF2B25; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:06:07 +0000 X-Env-Sender: Ian.Campbell@citrix.com X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-206.messagelabs.com!1387461965!5595776!1 X-Originating-IP: [66.165.176.89] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogNjYuMTY1LjE3Ni44OSA9PiAyMDMwMDc=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 12202 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2013 14:06:06 -0000 Received: from smtp.citrix.com (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by server-5.tower-206.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 Dec 2013 14:06:06 -0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,512,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="86153080" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 19 Dec 2013 14:06:04 +0000 Received: from [10.80.2.80] (10.80.2.80) by FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:06:03 -0500 Message-ID: <1387461962.9925.82.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> From: Ian Campbell To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:06:02 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20131213194326.GA28712@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <20131213194326.GA28712@phenom.dumpdata.com> Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc. X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.80.2.80] X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: George Dunlap , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.4 development update: Is PVH a blocker? X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xen.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org create ^ title it xl: require explicit action to share a disk between vms severity it wishlist thanks On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 14:43 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > == Open == > > > Also, xl as opposed to xend, allows me to share a disk without > any fanfare. > > Meaning I can do this: > > xl block-attach phy:/dev/sda latest1 xvda w > xl block-attach phy:/dev/sda latest2 xvda w > > while if I had used 'xend' I had to also append the '!' parameter > to denote it as 'shared'. > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel